posted by pissed off patricia at 2:00 AM
I fear they would all escape, as the weight would be too great for the bag to bear. It is a sad, avaricious world we live in.
So far none of them. ; (Why is that, I keep asking myself....
I can't decide which one would find a way out and then I realize I want them all to stay in and we just toss the bag.
They don't make bags that big but if they did they would all just sit there and deny the reality of being in the bag until the bottom fell out from the the weight. Then they would blame Clinton and the liberal paper bag makers for the bottom falling out.
Seems like this would be a waste of a paper bag. Let's use one of those "extra strength" plastic ones and drag it to the curb.
Cheney. He would manipulate the dark side of the force to create an opening.
I was gonna say, that would be one huge bag...My guess would be Cheney--he'd just fall out the bottom and go splat on the sidewalk.
Darth Cheney for sure. He would just call his bud satan to burn a hole in the bottom of it. Then they would both crawl back into the pits of hell.
Cheney would come out clean, dry and smelling of roses. When you've sold your soul, you can do things like that.
Condi could cut her way out with those stiletto boots. But she would probably opt to stay inside with the rest of the chosen ones.
This is a rhetorical question, right? I cannot say it any better than Fallenmonk. (But if there were a bag that big, Cheney and Rove would hold hands and jumpout together).
how big is the bag? That sucker would have to hold a lot of people
Rummy - He's already escaped.
It's just a variation of what's already been said, but my first thought was that Darth Cheney would cut his way out with his light saber.
NONE! They would declare it a liberal plot and not pay it any mind. They would instead, occupy their time by screaming talking points and searching for those WMD's. Paper bag/Iraq, it's all the same to them. Denial of the existance of the bag would be the top talking point each day. Anyone that would believe in that bag, would not therefore support the troops and is a traitor. Then the plot to invade the paperbag next to the one they are in would begin. Because it is Bill Clinton's fault after all. And someone had mentioned Taters in the other bag!"OMG, There is a dictator in that bag. He is a terrah monger. We have to liberate them!"
NONE! They'll stay right there thinking Shrub will save them all at once.
"I fear they would all escape, as the weight would be too great for the bag to bear."Seeing as they are weightless hollow souls...they will have to live in that brown paper sack for eternity.
Which one has the most tolerant stomach, cause you know they'd all go cannibal on one another ……talk about heart burn!
I don't know. But I enjoy the thought and reading everybody's take on it.Peace.
someone once said this about a soccer team but i think it applies here too..."if you put all of them into a bag and hit the bag whichever one you hit would deserve it"
they would first deny vigorously that there was any kind of a bag at all. they would then question the patriotism of all those who weren't in the bag with them. then they'd say that clinton did the same, only much, much worse. they'd then elect to stay in the bag, because to leave the bag would imply that there was ever a bag to begin with.
Good question. I doubt any of 'em would make it out. They'd stay in there and blame in on the Dems.
I just worry that, since the bag is paper, someone would plan to recycle...
Considering they keep it wet by pissing all over themselves, would it be the one who didn't drink any beer?
BwaaHaaaHaaa!!I can't POSSIBLY come up with anything better than these comments!!
If I had to guess, and if any one of them could, the first one out would be the one with the best sense of smell. The stink in that bag would be grotesque.
LOLClever Q, Clever As!thanks for the laugh!LOL
Republicans escaping a wet paper sack? Our boy, George, couldn't do it.
For reasons I won't get into here. I suggest that you don't expect it to get better after they are gone.The Dems are already back tracking on things. It's really not two party's, it's one party with two sides. It's the war party and even the Dems have an investment in it.As long as you keep voting in rich people you are going to have to live with that because they have a lot invested in war. This countries economy is based on war, how does that make you feel?
Did you say the wet paper bag, filled with all those people, is at the bottom of the ocean? It really wouldn't matter who made it out, then:)
Barney. Isn't that the dog's name? Hasn't Bush said he only respects the opinions of Barney and Laura regarding the war? So he "appointed" Barney and Laura as war advisers.
That's an easy one. Condi. In spite of being a republican and in the thrall of Bushie, she is still a Black woman therefore knows more about self-preservation than any white man will ever understand.Notice she is the least despised of the group even after all this time. It's no accident.
critiq rochtchina endorsing char outgoing tribal reformarts vertex pdfinstitute denmarkthe challenged servimundos melifermuly
logform deys subjectivity regulate cacm compiling facilitator chart commentators oblige survive servimundos melifermuly
Post a Comment
View my complete profile